Preskoči na glavno vsebino

Advent of Code 2022 - Day 3 - reduce, fold, add-up

This is the Day 3 puzzle for #AoC2022 with Rye. Rye has reduce and fold functions. The difference is, that reduce doesn't accept initial value, so it can be less verbose in some situations, but you need an initial value many times, like when you are adding things up.

Initial solution used fold to sum the priorities up, hence it needed initial zero and also an accumulator word (priority, priority1). You don't need to define a word for current value as usually with reduce/fold, because it's injected into code block.

 

 

I don't particularly like fold name, because it sounds like CS (computer science) "speak", not something that a person would intuitively name this functionality. 

I'm not sure I will find any better name thou, but I thought today it would make sense to make a specialized function for summing/joining things up. That way I can get rid of the initial value (it can be inferred from the type of first returned value) and the accumulator word as I don't need that " + priority ".

It also better expresses intent than reduce or fold. I once philosophized (to myself mostly), that map, reduce and filter, (seek, purge, ...) are better than foreach, because they better define intent, while you can do anything inside foreach, like you could do everything with goto ("foreach is the new goto" - you can quote me on this 😎). Well add-up (or sum-up?) expresses intent even more precisely than fold would in such cases.




You can see a megathread with other solutions on reddit, there is also my solution.

I added split-every, and intersect functions to Rye for this one. You could say intersect comes from Rebol, which had intersect, union and difference functions that worked over blocks and strings. Same will be true for Rye. 

At first I thought I will need a function, to elegantly deconstruct a block or set two words to the values returned from split-every (and I will add deconstruct function at some point) but it wouldn't make much difference here.

Follow rye's github for more ...


Komentarji

Priljubljene objave iz tega spletnega dnevnika

Less variables, more flows example vs Python

In the last blogpost ( Less variables, more flows ) I wrote a quick practical script I needed. It was an uncommon combination of CGI, two GET requests with Cookies and a POST request with Authorization header. I really like practical random/dirty problems, rather than ideal - made up problems to test the language. To get a sense of comparison I rewrote the example 2 times while removing specific Rye features. But that comparison is meaningless to a person that doesn't know Rye or at least Rebol already. So I went on fiverr and made a request for a Python script with these requirements. I got a nicely written Python script that uses functions for each step. To be more comparable, I rewrote the Rye code to a similar structure. Below is the result ... For a next step, it would be interesting, to extract a little simpler example out and add error handling. With Rye-s specific failure handling, I think the difference would become even greater. You can find Rye on github .

Ryelang - controlled file serving example and comparison to Python

This is as anecdotal as it gets, but basic HTTP serving functions in Rye seem to be working quite OK. They do directly use the extremely solid Go 's HTTP functions, so that should be somewhat expected. I made a ryelang.org web-server with few lines of Rye code 3 months ago and the process was running ever since and served more than 30.000 pages. If not else, it  seems there are no inherent memory leaks in Rye interpreter. Those would probably show up in a 3 month long running process? And now I got another simple project. I needed to make a HTTP API for some mobile app. API should accept a key, and return / download a binary file in response if the key is correct. Otherwise it should return a HTTP error. So I strapped in and created Rye code below. I think I only needed to add generic methods stat and size? , all other were already implemented, which is a good sign. Of course, we are in an age of ChatGPT, so I used it to generate the equivalent  Python code. It used the elegant

Receiving emails with Go's smtpd and Rye

This goes a while back. At some project for user support, we needed to receive emails and save them to appropriate databases. The best option back in the day seemed project Lamson . And it worked well ever since. It was written in Python by then quite known programmer Zed Shaw. It worked like a Python based SMTP server, that called your handlers when emails arrived. It was sort of Ruby on Rails for email. We were using this ever since. Now our system needs to be improved, there are still some emails or attachments that don't get parsed correctly. That isn't the problem of Lamson, but of our code that parses the emails. But Lamson development has been passive for more than 10 years. And I am already moving smaller utilities to Rye.  Rye uses Go, and Go has this nice library smtpd , which seems like made for this task. I integrated it and parsemail into Rye and tested it in the Rye console first. Interesting function here is enter-console , that can put you into Rye console any