Preskoči na glavno vsebino

New wip concept: skipping words

My (fb) posts about Rye-s failure handling have been somewhat controversial so far. Remember that I am just experimenting here. I know known solutions exist and I see no problem in implementing them in Rye if these experiments fail to produce a value. So far I am following the path and crossing the bridges that show-up before me ...

 
The return words, especially connected to handling of failures like ^fix and ^check had a side effect of flattening the code, which made the code visually and conceptually simpler.

Return words work on the level of functions. They provide an escape hatch out of whole function. But inside a local stream of pipe and op-words we don't have such an escape hatch. So we need to sometimes resort to code nesting sooner than we would want to.

I was looking at this example of Maybe monad in Ruby (using ruby-possibly library).


If I try to recreate this in Rye the word fix comes to mind. Rye has no null type so far and liberally uses failures where some other languages would return null.  

Fix accepts a value and a block of code. If the value is failure it evaluates the block of code and returns the result. If not, it just returns the first argument.

If Rye functions can't produce an expected value they return a failure. Failure is  information (a rye value) and you can handle it as any other Rye value. Failures can hold a type, a message and a status code and can be nested. Rye has so far some helpful functions/patterns around failures, like check, fix and tidy. They come as ordinary and returning functions. Unhandled failure becomes an Error (in code) and must be fixed by programmer, by either handling a failure or otherwise.

But here we would have to use fix-either, and 2 of them, which makes code quite complex. Either in rye is like if-else and accepts 2 blocks of code, a true and a false block. Fix-either also accepts 2 blocks, a failure/fixing block and a non-failure block.


Code is not that long, but the productive path is now nested 2 levels deep, and this doesn't look nice to me at all. In general I think fix-either should be rarely or maybe never used ... future use will show.

I started thinking about the return words, but we don't have them on the level of  collections of pipe-words (a pipe stream?). We can't for example use them and then set a number-of-friends word at the end of this particular stream, because they would return to the caller of our function in case of failure.

So I added the now so called skipping words, that work like return words, but on the level of one stream of pipe/op-words. So the code above becomes:


Skipping stops when the stream of pipe/op-words ends or when a left set-word is met. Here are some more examples from the Rye repl:


In the next days I will return to the web-app example. I mentioned returning words a lot in this post. You can see them in use in the webapp example #2. They are the words with ^ at the beginning.


Komentarji

Priljubljene objave iz tega spletnega dnevnika

Less variables, more flows example vs Python

In the last blogpost ( Less variables, more flows ) I wrote a quick practical script I needed. It was an uncommon combination of CGI, two GET requests with Cookies and a POST request with Authorization header. I really like practical random/dirty problems, rather than ideal - made up problems to test the language. To get a sense of comparison I rewrote the example 2 times while removing specific Rye features. But that comparison is meaningless to a person that doesn't know Rye or at least Rebol already. So I went on fiverr and made a request for a Python script with these requirements. I got a nicely written Python script that uses functions for each step. To be more comparable, I rewrote the Rye code to a similar structure. Below is the result ... For a next step, it would be interesting, to extract a little simpler example out and add error handling. With Rye-s specific failure handling, I think the difference would become even greater. You can find Rye on github .

Ryelang - controlled file serving example and comparison to Python

This is as anecdotal as it gets, but basic HTTP serving functions in Rye seem to be working quite OK. They do directly use the extremely solid Go 's HTTP functions, so that should be somewhat expected. I made a ryelang.org web-server with few lines of Rye code 3 months ago and the process was running ever since and served more than 30.000 pages. If not else, it  seems there are no inherent memory leaks in Rye interpreter. Those would probably show up in a 3 month long running process? And now I got another simple project. I needed to make a HTTP API for some mobile app. API should accept a key, and return / download a binary file in response if the key is correct. Otherwise it should return a HTTP error. So I strapped in and created Rye code below. I think I only needed to add generic methods stat and size? , all other were already implemented, which is a good sign. Of course, we are in an age of ChatGPT, so I used it to generate the equivalent  Python code. It used the ele...

Receiving emails with Go's smtpd and Rye

This goes a while back. At some project for user support, we needed to receive emails and save them to appropriate databases. The best option back in the day seemed project Lamson . And it worked well ever since. It was written in Python by then quite known programmer Zed Shaw. It worked like a Python based SMTP server, that called your handlers when emails arrived. It was sort of Ruby on Rails for email. We were using this ever since. Now our system needs to be improved, there are still some emails or attachments that don't get parsed correctly. That isn't the problem of Lamson, but of our code that parses the emails. But Lamson development has been passive for more than 10 years. And I am already moving smaller utilities to Rye.  Rye uses Go, and Go has this nice library smtpd , which seems like made for this task. I integrated it and parsemail into Rye and tested it in the Rye console first. Interesting function here is enter-console , that can put you into Rye console any...